Monitoring and Evaluating Evidence-Based Self-Management Programs

Presenters:

Susan Millstein, LCSW, MPH
Rachael Ruberto, MPH, CPH
Tracy Mills, MPP, CWPC

At the conclusion of the presentation, the participants will be able to:

Describe evidence-based self-management programs for the prevention and management of chronic disease are and be able to list examples;
Define program evaluation and performance monitoring as it relates to evidence-based interventions and explain why they are important;
Identify existing resources to evaluate and monitor three aspects of implementing evidence-based self-management programs; and
Review an example of a local evaluation.

* Fields marked with an asterisk are required

Participant Information

Work location: *

Job position / Role: *

Type of organization / Work setting: *

Are you Hispanic, Latino/a, or Spanish origin? * (One or more categories may be selected)

Mexican, Mexican American, Chicano/a Puerto Rican Cuban Another Hispanic, Latino/a, or Spanish Origin Not of Hispanic, Latino/a, or Spanish Origin Unknown

What is your race? * (One or more categories may be selected)

American Indian or Alaska Native Nation or Tribal Affiliation:
Asian Indian Chinese Filipino Japanese Korean Vietnamese Other Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander White Other Please specify:

Gender: *

Other gender (required if "Other" was chosen above)

Age: *

How many years have you worked in your field? *

Do you work with medically underserved communities and/or special populations? *
Note: Medically Underserved Populations may include groups of persons who face economic, cultural or linguistic barriers to health care.

Motivation to Participate

How did you first find out about this activity? *

If you answered "Other" above, please specify:
(required if "Other" was chosen above)

What was your primary motivation to participate in this activity? *

If requested above, please provide more specific information:
(required based on your answer above)

Program Evaluation

Using the rating scale, please rate the following.

Overall, the course was high quality. *

Learning Outcome
As a result of this educational activity, I have increased and enhanced my knowledge and competence on: *
“Increasing the availability, accessibility and use of evidence-based interventions to prevent or manage chronic disease is a key strategy within the Prevent Chronic Diseases focus area of the New York State Prevention Agenda. The value of these programs and progress toward achieving Prevention Agenda outcomes can be demonstrated through ongoing performance measurement and program evaluation. NYSDOH staff working with the Prevention Agenda has identified a need for local health departments to be able to conduct effective program monitoring of evidence-based chronic disease interventions such as self-management programs as a key component in tracking indicators and goals in the Prevention Agenda. The purpose of this webinar is to introduce the concepts of evaluation and performance measurement as they relate to evidence-based self-management programs for chronic disease, and to clarify evaluation concepts and provide relatable examples”

Objectives/Learner's achievement of each objective
As a result of this educational activity, I am able to:

Describe evidence-based self-management programs for the prevention and management of chronic disease are and be able to list examples; *

Define program evaluation and performance monitoring as it relates to evidence-based interventions and explain why they are important; *

Identify existing resources to evaluate and monitor three aspects of implementing evidence-based self-management programs; and *

Review an example of a local evaluation. *

Presenters

Presenter 1
Susan Millstein, LCSW, MPH

Is knowledgeable in content area *

Content is consistent with objectives *

Teaching strategies were appropriate for topic *

Teaching by this presenter was effective *

Presenter 2
Rachael Ruberto, MPH, CPH

Is knowledgeable in content area *

Content is consistent with objectives *

Teaching strategies were appropriate for topic *

Teaching by this presenter was effective *

Presenter 3
Tracy Mills, MPP, CWPC

Is knowledgeable in content area *

Content is consistent with objectives *

Teaching strategies were appropriate for topic *

Teaching by this presenter was effective *

Conflict of Interest

Was information related to presenter conflict of interest and/or commercial bias shared with you before or during the activity? *

Was this activity free of commercial bias or conflict? *

If not, why?

Outcomes of Education

Please rate your intention to change your practice as a result of this educational activity. *

If you will use this information in your practice, what do you anticipate doing differently?

How confident are you in your ability to use what you learned to make a change or enhance your practice? *

How committed are you in your ability to use what you learned to make a change or enhance your practice? *

Please list up to three specific barriers you have identified that will prevent you from incorporating what you have learned into practice.

Comments

Please list up to three specific strengths of this learning activity/offering.

Please list up to three specific areas to improve this learning activity/offering.

Do you have additional training needs you would like to see offered?

Submit Evaluation

(Not eligible for continuing education credits)